Case 3304024/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Bazleys Pubs and Inns Ltd (in liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304024/2022
- Decision date
- 13 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby, sitting alone at Reading via CVP on 13 January 2023, extended time under s.11(4)(b) ERA 1996 because it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to make the reference within three months of her employment ending. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal then found that Bazleys Pubs and Inns Limited (in liquidation) had failed to provide the claimant with pay statements for her weekly pay during her employment from 10 April 2021 until 18 December 2021, apart from one statement she managed to obtain for an unspecified date. The tribunal recorded that there was no evidence before it as to the amount of any deduction from the sum paid on 29 December 2021.
Because of that evidential gap, the tribunal made no award under s.12(4) ERA 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment found that the respondent failed to provide any pay statements for the claimant's weekly pay from 10 April 2021 to 18 December 2021, save for one statement she managed to obtain for an unspecified date. No award was made under section 12(4) ERA 1996 because there was no evidence as to the amount of any deduction from the sum paid on 29 December 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.11(4)(b) ERA 1996
- s.12(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.