Case 3304031/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Jama v Glenn Group — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304031/2024
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Jama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 October 2024, the Tribunal gave Ms S Jama an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 29 August 2024 and because the matter had not been actively pursued. The 29 August order had been sent by post to the claimant's then representative, and the warning letter was sent by email to the claimant.
The judgment records that there was further correspondence from the Tribunal, including on 12 December 2024, but the claimant failed to make written representations and failed to respond at all. On that basis, Employment Judge Quill struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 16 December 2024 was cancelled as a result. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim(s) and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 29 August 2024 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.