Case 3304040/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Fisher v Noir Cafes Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304040/2022
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Fisher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim without reaching the merits. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also noted that, on 2 January 2024, it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis concluded that the claim should be struck out. The judgment records the strike out decision on 2 February 2024 and that it was sent to the parties on 20 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the underlying claim type; the claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for this case. The tribunal struck out 'the claim' because the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the register, and the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.