Case 3304045/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Fullbrook v Chef2table Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304045/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Fullbrook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Fullbrook presented her claim to the Watford Employment Tribunal on 18 April 2024. The respondent, Chef2table Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,194 gross. It also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £300.60. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for paying any tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and under rule 22 the Employment Judge determined the claim. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,194 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,194 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and under rule 22 the Employment Judge determined the claim. The tribunal found that the claimant's holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £300.60. | Upheld | — | £301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,495
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.