Case 3304047/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Smith v Bloomer Flowers B.V — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304047/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the Respondent failed to present a response to the claim. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of Mr T Smith without a contested hearing on the merits in the extracted text.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay redundancy pay of £6,825.00, unpaid wages of £5,718.06, and holiday pay of £635.35. Those three sums together made a total award of £13,178.41.
The extracted judgment contains no further reasons, findings of fact, or explanation of how each figure was calculated beyond the stated heads of claim and award amounts.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,825 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this award as 'unpaid wages' rather than using a fuller legal label. | Upheld | — | £5,718 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,178
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.