Case 3304065/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A J Linney v Elite Business Systems UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304065/2018
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A J Linney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal decision. It records that, at the hearing on 16 March 2020 before Employment Judge M Warren at Bury St Edmunds, the parties agreed terms of settlement. The claimant was represented by Mr Mc Grath, counsel, and the respondent by Ms C Crew, counsel.
On that basis, the tribunal stated that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon having been withdrawn. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy, and it does not record any award of compensation or other monetary relief.
The case therefore ended by settlement and withdrawal rather than by adjudication of the merits. The only outcome recorded in the judgment is dismissal of the claims following withdrawal, with the judgment sent to the parties on 15 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon having been withdrawn. The underlying listing categories identify a public interest disclosure claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.