Case 3304084/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Lalji v Medecho Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304084/2018
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr A Scott, Mr D Wharton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Lalji
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms Z Lalji was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 from 3 February 2017 and at all relevant times after that date. It also found that she was dismissed by Medecho Ltd on 22 February 2018. All complaints were held to be within jurisdiction, with no time-limit or early conciliation bar. The complaint of deduction from wages was found well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of deduction from wages was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was found in relation to the unfavourable remuneration paid while the claimant was working from home. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was also found in relation to the dismissal; the tribunal held the dismissal contravened section 39(2)(c) because it was section 15 discrimination. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was found in relation to the requirement that employees work from the office premises to receive the basic pay component of remuneration and the requirement to use holiday entitlement for absences caused by genuine inability to work due to ill health. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination under section 21 Equality Act 2010 was found in relation to the failure to make reasonable adjustments while the claimant was working from home, including failing to pay any basic pay, failing to agree her hours, failing to provide remote access to computer systems, and failing to reduce the disadvantage caused by not having that access. |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- section 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- section 39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010
- sections 94 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23(1)(a) National Minimum Wage Act 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.