Case 3304122/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lee v BMW (UK) Manufacturing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304122/2018
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned a public preliminary hearing on whether the claimant's claims should be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, including on limitation grounds. The claimant's first claim included allegations of direct race discrimination and victimisation, and his second claim alleged further victimisation. The respondent denied the claims and argued that the discrimination and victimisation complaints had no reasonable prospect of success and that parts of the claims were out of time.
On the direct race discrimination complaint, the tribunal held that the claimant had identified a comparator of a different race and had alleged a failure to follow the respondent's performance management procedure. The tribunal considered that such matters could potentially support an inference of discrimination and that the absence of an earlier allegation of race discrimination did not make the claim totally inconsistent with discrimination.
On victimisation, the tribunal noted that the claimant accepted his grievance did not contain an allegation of race discrimination, but found it remained arguable that section 27(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 could apply. For the second victimisation claim, the tribunal found it could not decide the reasons for the respondent's acts without hearing the full evidence. The tribunal also found the claimant had shown a prima facie case on time limits, but made no substantive determination on limitation. The claims were not struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal decided only the respondent's strike-out application. The direct race discrimination complaints were not struck out; no final determination on liability or limitation was made. | Other | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal decided only the respondent's strike-out application. The victimisation complaints in both claims were not struck out; no final determination on liability or limitation was made. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union 2001 ICR 391
- Mecharov v Citibank UKEAT/0041/16
- Javed v Blackpool Teaching Hospitals UKEAT 0135/17
- section 27(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.