Case 3304137/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Galano Mr S Baccolini Ms S Correia v Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304137/2019
- Decision date
- 11 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Galano Mr S Baccolini Ms S Correia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case numbers 3304137/2019, 3304146/2019 and 3304149/2019 were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims. No substantive findings on liability, the issues in dispute, or the legal basis of the claims are set out in the extracted judgment text.
The judgment is a short disposal order only. It identifies the respondent as Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and is dated 24 January 2020, with the judgment sent to the parties on 11 February 2020. No remedy, liability decision, or reasons beyond the withdrawals are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawals of the claims by the claimants. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawals of the claims by the claimants. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawals of the claims by the claimants. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.