Case 3304150/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Brown v Miss Verity Edley and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304150/2020
- Decision date
- 8 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs G Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 November 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim against Miss Verity Edley should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the Tribunal struck out the claim against Miss Verity Edley under rule 37. The judgment states that this does not affect the claim against the other respondent, and that the hearing fixed for 22 April 2021 remained listed. The short judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only strikes out the claim against Miss Verity Edley under rule 37; it does not affect the claim against the other respondent. The underlying cause of action is not set out in this short judgment, but the case listing category was unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.