Case 3304156/2020 · Employment Tribunal
- Ms Roxanne Campbell v – 3304156/2020 - Isaac Soloman Respondent: – 3305260/2020 and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304156/2020
- Decision date
- 31 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
5 namedClaimant
- Ms Roxanne Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held in private by CVP at Watford on 7 July 2022, Employment Judge R S Drake considered case numbers 3304156/2020 and 3305260/2020. Ms Roxanne Campbell was represented by Mr S Martins; Ms Y Barlay appeared for respondent 1, and the other respondents did not attend because no responses had been entered.
The tribunal found that Ms Campbell was employed by Glan Agua UK Ltd, or was a contract worker for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, for all purposes relevant to both actions. It also found that she did have, and had at all material times, a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment records these preliminary findings only and does not determine liability or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue: the tribunal held that Ms Campbell was employed by Glan Agua UK Ltd, or alternatively was a contract worker for Equality Act purposes, for all purposes relevant to both actions. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue: the tribunal held that Ms Campbell did have, and had at all material times, a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 6 EqA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.