Case 3304161/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Jarman v Venetia’s Kitchen Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304161/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Jarman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued under the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the respondent failed to present a valid response. Employment Judge Lang determined the claim on the papers and ordered Venetia’s Kitchen Ltd to pay Miss N Jarman a total of £1,693.13.
The judgment breaks the total down into unpaid wages of £1,102.50, notice pay of £315.00, and holiday pay of £275.63. The decision does not provide further factual findings or reasons beyond the Rule 21 template wording, and it records no additional award components such as compensation, injury to feelings, or interest.
No panel members are listed, and the judgment is signed by Employment Judge Lang on 11 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment orders payment of £1,102.50 described as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,103 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment orders payment of £315.00 described as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £315 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment orders payment of £275.63 described as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £276 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.