Case 3304162/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Jones v Revolution Zero CIC and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304162/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms S Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Skehan, sitting alone on 8 July 2021, accepted that Ms S Jones had a mental impairment in the form of PTSD during the relevant period, 1 November 2018 to 2 October 2020, and that the condition had been formally diagnosed by Prof Long in May 2021. The tribunal also accepted that she had a history of anxiety, sleep problems and related symptoms, and considered the effects of medication and therapy during that period.
The tribunal held, however, that the impairment did not have a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It found that the effect of medication was minimal, and that there was no evidence that therapy changed her ability to carry out day-to-day tasks. On the evidence, she could drive on ordinary roads, use public transport, shop, and attend some social activities; her avoidance of motorways, crowded places and certain routes was treated as a coping strategy rather than a substantial limitation.
The tribunal further found that public speaking, unplanned interviews, redundancy consultations, litigation hearings, working in a chaotic environment, and the need for written instructions either were not normal day-to-day activities or were not shown by medical evidence to arise from PTSD. Other reported symptoms, including tachycardia, hypervigilance, panic attacks, acne rosacea and proctitis, did not alter that conclusion. Ms Jones was therefore not a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, so the claims under sections 13, 15, 19 and 20-21 were dismissed. The separate victimisation claim under section 27 was not decided at this hearing and was listed to proceed to the final hearing; the judge also noted, without deciding it, that respondent knowledge would have been an issue because diagnosis post-dated termination.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Section 13 direct disability discrimination dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of PTSD. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 discrimination arising from disability dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of PTSD. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 19 indirect disability discrimination dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of PTSD. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Sections 20 and 21 failure to make reasonable adjustments dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of PTSD. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 s.6(1)
- "substantial" means more than minor or trivial
- normal day-to-day activities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.