Case 3304165/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Mistry v Travelodge Hotels Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304165/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Mistry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned from her supervisor role after raising concerns about her relationship with her manager, training and support, fact-finding meetings, staffing, lighting in reception, and handling of personal information. The tribunal treated the incident on 19 December 2019, when the manager was downloading CCTV for an investigation and asked the claimant to leave the office, as the alleged final straw.
The tribunal found that the manager had reasonable and proper cause for asking the claimant to leave the office because she was carrying out a confidential task relating to an investigation and instructing the claimant to start a housekeeping meeting. It rejected parts of the claimant's account of that incident, including that she had been banished from the office or rudely shouted at, though it found the manager snapped at her later when she returned despite a do not disturb sign.
Considering the alleged acts individually and cumulatively, the tribunal found no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. It found the respondent had reasonable and proper cause for the fact-finding meetings, that training and support were adequate for the claimant's role, that some mistakes were addressed, and that delays over the reception lights did not amount to conduct likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence. The claimant's employment therefore ended by resignation, not dismissal, and the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant resigned and was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint failed because the tribunal found there was no dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Tullett Prebon plc v BGC Brokers LP
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.