Case 3304167/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dunsby v Paige Airport Parking Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304167/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dunsby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Dunsby, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Paige Airport Parking Ltd (in liquidation) and then dealt with the claimant’s termination-related claims arising from the end of his employment.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded him a redundancy payment of £1,935.68. It also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination, and ordered payment of £256.47 gross for that sum.
The tribunal further found that the respondent was in breach of contract because it dismissed the claimant without his full notice. It awarded £1,451.69 gross damages for that breach, noting that the award was for net loss but calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,935.68. | Upheld | — | £1,936 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; the tribunal ordered payment of £256.47 gross. | Upheld | — | £256 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached contract by dismissing the claimant without full notice and awarded £1,451.69 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £1,452 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,644
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.