Case 3304169/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jenkins, Counsel. For the v Mr Cameron, employment consultant — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304169/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jenkins, Counsel. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied to strike out the respondent's response on the grounds that the respondent had failed to comply with orders and/or that the defence was no longer actively pursued. Employment Judge Postle refused that application. The tribunal also made an unless order against the respondent in relation to a separate case management hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant's costs of the hearing, comprising a contribution of £300 plus VAT towards the claimant's solicitor's costs and £600 plus VAT for counsel's brief fee. The total costs order was £900 plus VAT. This written record does not determine the substantive merits of the underlying employment claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This written record does not adjudicate a substantive employment claim. It records the refusal of the claimant's strike-out application and a separate costs order. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.