Case 3304177/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Whittaker v Octagon Medical Practice — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304177/2022
- Decision date
- 4 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Whittaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns case management rather than the merits of the underlying dispute. By a letter dated 13 November 2022, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 10 July 2022.
The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment notes that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine a substantive employment claim. It records that the respondent's response was struck out after failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 10 July 2022 and failure to make sufficient representations or request a hearing by the letter dated 13 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.