Case 3304185/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R I Wanniachchi v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304185/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R I Wanniachchi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mr R I Wanniachchi against Tesco Stores Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant.
No substantive findings on liability, facts, legal issues, or remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The gov.uk listing categories indicate unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and breach of contract, but the judgment does not separately adjudicate or identify each claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The disability discrimination classification is based on the supplied gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself does not set out particulars of the discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The breach of contract classification is based on the supplied gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself does not set out particulars of the contract claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.