Case 3304186/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Muyiwa-George v Grosvenor Associates Ltd (Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304186/2022
- Decision date
- 3 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Muyiwa-George
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms B Muyiwa-George's claim against Grosvenor Associates Ltd (Compulsory Liquidation). The reason given was that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that, on 27 July 2023, it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the tribunal held that the claim was struck out. No substantive liability finding or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify or determine any underlying substantive claim separately; it states that the claim as a whole was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the claimant had not obtained the court's permission required by the Insolvency Act 1986, and because the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being invited to explain why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.