Case 3304219/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Anderson v Veka Recycling Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304219/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South East Region Employment Tribunals on 4 April 2022. The judgment records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and that the Employment Judge was satisfied a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claim succeeded. No substantive liability reasoning is set out in the extracted text beyond the rule 21 default judgment basis, and no remedy figure was fixed in this judgment.
The tribunal directed that the claimant's remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, notice of which would follow in due course. The extracted text does not identify any separate heads of loss, any award, or any panel members sitting with the judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim succeeds because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time under rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.