Case 3304221/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Mekki, Managing Partner — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304221/2022
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 22-23 May 2023, Employment Judge French gave judgment in a short record without written reasons. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Mekki, Managing Partner.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's breach of contract claim and also dismissed the employer's contract claim. It upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages as well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £92.48.
The tribunal further made an award under s38 Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' wages in the sum of £252.11. The total amount ordered by the judgment was therefore £344.59.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment also dismisses the employer's contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded and upheld, and the respondent was ordered to pay £92.48. | Upheld | — | £92 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £345
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.