Case 3304230/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In-person For the v PDA Enfield Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304230/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smeaton Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In-person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Malins worked for PDA Enfield Ltd from 23 September 2019 to 31 July 2020 under a fixed-term contract paying £30,000 per annum. The respondent did not present a response and default judgment was entered. The tribunal considered claims about unpaid wages, pension-related deductions, unpaid holiday pay and the failure to provide itemised payslips.
On the wage deduction issue, the tribunal accepted that the outstanding salary figure of £2,841.75 had been paid shortly after the claim was lodged, so no financial award was made for that amount. It nevertheless held that the respondent's failure to pay the wages on time amounted to an unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 and made a declaration accordingly.
On the pension issue, the tribunal held that employer pension contributions themselves were not recoverable as wages, but it distinguished those from deductions taken from the claimant's salary for pension purposes. It accepted the claimant's evidence that two £50 deductions in October and November 2019 had not been paid over, and found unauthorised deductions totalling £100.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had taken no holiday during a ten-month period spanning one holiday year and was entitled to 4.79 weeks' accrued but untaken leave. It awarded £2,763.46 gross for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. It further found that the respondent failed to provide itemised payslips contrary to s.8 ERA 1996, but no separate monetary award is recorded for that complaint.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages of £2,841.75 was paid shortly after the claim was issued; the tribunal made a declaration of unauthorised deduction/late payment but no financial award on that sum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal distinguished employer pension contributions from deductions from salary intended to be paid into the pension. It found two unrepaid £50 deductions in October and November 2019, totalling £100. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant had taken no holiday during a ten-month period spanning one holiday year and was found to be owed 4.79 weeks' accrued but untaken leave. | Upheld | — | £2,763 |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide itemised payslips contrary to s.8 ERA 1996; the judgment records the breach but no separate monetary award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,863
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.8 ERA 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Somerset County Council v Chambers (Appeal no. UKEAT/0417/12/KN)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.