Case 3304234/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Roger Trenoweth v David Parrin — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304234/2020
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Tribunal
- Panel members
- C Grant, J Costley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Roger Trenoweth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRoger Trenoweth, who was 62, worked for David Parrin as the main MOT tester from 1 June 2018. On 23 March 2020, when the first Covid lockdown began and MOT certificates were extended by six months, the respondent closed the garage and dismissed Mr Trenoweth and another employee by reason of redundancy. Mr Trenoweth claimed that the respondent intended to replace him with his son, Andrew Parrin, and that this amounted to age discrimination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim was dismissed. The tribunal also made a separate costs order of £2,000 against the claimant under Rule 76, but that was not a compensation award on the claim. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- direct discrimination
- burden of proof
- Rule 76(1)(b) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- Kopel v Safeway Stores Plc
- Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.