Case 3304237/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Barber v Gastro Pubs Limited t/a Middletons Steakhouse and Grill — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304237/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Annand Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Barber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Barber worked for Gastro Pubs Limited T/A Middletons Steakhouse and Grill as a Head Chef from January 2022 until she resigned with immediate effect on 21 March 2023. Her final monthly wages, payable at the end of March 2023, were £2,025.76, but she did not receive that payment. The tribunal treated the issue as whether the respondent was entitled to withhold the final wages under the claimant’s contract of employment and section 13 ERA 1996.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not in "retail employment" for the purposes of sections 17 to 22 ERA 1996, because in her role as Head Chef she did not carry out retail transactions directly with the public or collect amounts payable in connection with such transactions. It therefore rejected the suggestion that those provisions provided the relevant basis for the deduction.
The respondent relied on a contractual deductions clause relating to cash shortages and stock deficiencies. The tribunal held that the clause did not authorise withholding the claimant’s wages on the facts proved. It found that the respondent had shown only a difference between two stock counts, valued at £3,769.07, but had not shown what the actual stock deficiencies were. It also held that the respondent had not proved that any shortages arose during shifts worked by the claimant, as the clause required. The tribunal further noted that it had not been shown that the additional contractual paragraph permitting recovery of the balance in full from final pay formed part of the claimant’s own contract.
Accordingly, the tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,025.76 net, with the respondent liable to account for the tax and national insurance due to HMRC. The tribunal made no findings on who was to blame for the stock discrepancies and did not decide any claim about the failure to provide a final payslip, because no such claim had been brought.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the claimant’s net March 2023 wages of £2,025.76. It also recorded that the respondent is liable to pay the associated tax and national insurance to HMRC directly. | Upheld | — | £2,026 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,026
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.17 ERA 1996
- s.18 ERA 1996
- s.22 ERA 1996
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor [2019] ICR 433
- London Underground Ltd v Jaeger EAT 805/97
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.