Case 3304249/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kapur v Marvel International Logistics Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304249/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kapur
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs S Kapur's claim against Marvel International Logistics Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). The reasons given were that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 21 July 2023 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying pleaded claim(s) in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986, and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being invited on 21 July 2023 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.