Case 3304254/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Phillips v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304254/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint of age discrimination. It had previously sent a notice dated 13 July 2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the age discrimination complaint was struck out.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 19-23 September 2022, to proceed before an employment judge sitting alone rather than a full tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment only determines the age discrimination complaint. It records that remaining claim(s) remained listed for a later hearing and does not determine them. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.