Case 3304257/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Stevenitt v ICP Asset Management Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304257/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Stevenitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Anstis on 14 April 2021, amended the respondent’s name to ICP Asset Management Limited and determined three substantive monetary issues. It found that Ms J Stevenitt had been unfairly dismissed and awarded her £12,913.51 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay and ordered it to pay £647.68 to the claimant by way of holiday pay.
In addition, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay an additional award of £923.04 under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. The judgment states that the recoupment regulations do not apply. No separate basic award, interest figure, or discrimination finding is recorded in the judgment extract supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded £12,913.51 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment also recorded an additional award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, but that is not allocated to this claim as a separate figure in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £12,914 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unlawful deductions from wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay and ordered payment of £647.68. | Upheld | — | £648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,484
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,914
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.