Case 3304257/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Cross v Carlton Packaging LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304257/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs B Handley-Howorth, Mrs Sarah Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Cross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 20 to 23 May 2024 before Employment Judge K J Palmer, sitting with Mrs B Handley-Howorth and Mrs Sarah Allen. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal’s unanimous judgment was that the claimant’s claims in direct discrimination because of sex and/or sexual orientation failed and were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Claim for direct discrimination because of sexual orientation failed and was dismissed in the unanimous judgment. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim for direct discrimination because of sex failed and was dismissed in the unanimous judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.