Case 3304260/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Khan v Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304260/2023
- Decision date
- 12 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kumar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Khan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment following a CVP hearing at Cambridge ET on 20 March 2024 before Employment Judge Kumar sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr G Deane of counsel.
The tribunal refused the respondent's applications to strike out the claim or for a deposit order. It recorded that the question of whether the claim was presented within the applicable time limit would be decided at the final hearing.
The tribunal also refused the claimant's application for a deposit order. No substantive liability findings were made on the underlying claim and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records refusal of the respondent's applications to strike out the claim or for a deposit order, and refusal of the claimant's application for a deposit order. It does not adjudicate the underlying unfair dismissal, race discrimination, or public interest disclosure claims listed by gov.uk. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.