Case 3304263/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L. Bacon v Palmers (St. Albans) Ltd. Hearing: Final Hearing — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304263/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L. Bacon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L. Bacon brought a claim of unfair (constructive) dismissal under ss.94-98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against Palmers (St. Albans) Ltd. The case was heard by video/CVP at Watford Employment Tribunal on 10-11 September 2025 before Employment Judge Tinnion, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr D. Branch.
The tribunal held that the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The published judgment does not set out the tribunal’s full reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment records no monetary award and no separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair (constructive) dismissal under ss.94-98 ERA 1996 was not well founded. Reasons were given orally, so the published judgment contains no detailed written reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss.94-98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.