Case 3304269/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Latinwo, legal assistant. For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304269/2018
- Decision date
- 24 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms S. Goldthorpe, Mr S. Bury
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J. Latinwo, legal assistant. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Watford on 17 to 19 and 22 to 24 July 2019 before Employment Judge Heal, with Ms S. Goldthorpe and Mr S. Bury as lay members. The judgment record names the appearances for both sides and records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons accompany the decision text provided here.
The tribunal dismissed the complaints of unfair dismissal and dismissal because of public interest disclosure. It also dismissed the discrimination complaints based on race and religion or belief. The extracted record does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning for those outcomes, only the result on each complaint.
No monetary award is recorded in the decision text provided, and no remedy split is given for any individual complaint.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment record states this complaint was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment record states the complaint of dismissal because of public interest disclosure was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment record states the race discrimination complaint was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment record states the religion or belief discrimination complaint was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.