Case 3304288/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds holiday-pay and breach-of-contract claims against Car Finance Giant
An employment tribunal has upheld holiday pay and breach of contract claims against Car Finance Giant. The tribunal recorded a total award of £600.
- Case reference
- 3304288/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Chenery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21. Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the claim succeeded and ordered the respondent, Car Finance Giant, to pay the claimant, Mr P Chenery, £600.00.
The award was split into £120.00 for holiday pay and £480.00 for notice pay. No further reasoning, findings of fact, or legal analysis are set out in the extracted text beyond the statement that the claim succeeds and the amounts awarded.
On that wording, the material adjudicated claims are holiday pay and notice pay, both upheld. The judgment does not record any separate tribunal findings on liability beyond the Rule 21 outcome or any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the claim succeeds and includes £120.00 for holiday pay within the total award. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claim succeeds and includes £480.00 for notice pay within the total award. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.