Case 3304323/2022 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance or v Ms J Twomey barrister — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304323/2022
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance or
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 October 2023 at London South, Employment Judge Truscott QC struck out the claimant's claim under Rule 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d). The tribunal recorded that the claimant had failed to comply with Orders of the Tribunal and was not actively pursuing his claim.
The judgment does not set out any merits findings on the substantive claims in the extracted text. It does record that the full merits hearing listed for 8 July 2024, together with the subsequent four days, was discharged.
The tribunal also made a costs order against the claimant in favour of the respondent in the sum of £5,000 under Rule 76(2).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim. The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) because the claimant had failed to comply with tribunal orders and was not actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Rule 76(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.