Case 3304339/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McBride v Barton Stud Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304339/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McBride
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records three claim outcomes only. The claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of a bonus payment was dismissed upon withdrawal. The claimant's claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed, and the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was also dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No detailed findings of fact or legal analysis are set out in the published text, so the extract only captures the formal disposal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this bonus-payment unlawful deduction claim as 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.