Case 3304358/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Julian Cutting v Bidfood — 2026
- Case reference
- 3304358/2025
- Decision date
- 22 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Julian Cutting
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJulian Cutting's claim against Bidfood was struck out by Employment Judge Graham on 22 June 2026. The grounds were that Cutting had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 15 January 2026 and had not actively pursued the claim.
The tribunal wrote to Cutting on 30 March 2026, warning that it was considering striking out the claim and giving an opportunity to explain why it should not do so or to request a hearing. Cutting did not reply. The judge was satisfied that the grounds for strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that striking out the claim accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type, so the listing's unfair dismissal classification cannot be verified from the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Overriding objective in Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.