Case 3304362/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v R Phillips T/a UK Cleaning, now known as: UK Cleaning Contracts Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304362/2022
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss Kowalenko was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £1,569.60. It did not award immediate or future loss because she remained on sick leave, unable to work and in receipt of statutory sick pay after her employment was terminated.
The tribunal also found that the Respondents were in breach of contract in relation to notice pay and awarded £1,046.40. It awarded £1,043.28 for accrued but untaken holiday at termination and £1,046.40, representing four weeks' pay, for failure to provide itemised pay slips.
The total award ordered against the Respondents was £4,705.68. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are included in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the Claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award. It found she was not entitled to immediate or future loss because she remained on sick leave, unable to work and in receipt of statutory sick pay after termination. | Upheld | — | £1,570 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,046 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found accrued holiday was untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £1,043 |
| Other | The tribunal found the Respondents failed to provide itemised pay slips and awarded four weeks' pay. The locked taxonomy does not contain a specific itemised pay statement claim type. | Upheld | — | £1,046 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,706
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,570
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.