Case 3304471/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jason Hunt and Mardi Hunt T/a Crazy Bear Farm and Farm Shop — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304471/2018
- Decision date
- 4 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Szymaniak had worked as a farm labourer for Jason Hunt and Mardi Hunt t/a Crazy Bear Farm and Farm Shop since 1 May 2011. The central dispute was whether he resigned in early February 2018, as the Respondents said, or was dismissed by telephone on 14 February 2018, as he said. The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence, found that the alleged 2 February 2018 meeting did not take place, and held that he was dismissed by telephone while on holiday in Poland.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the Respondents denied that any dismissal took place and therefore did not show the reason for dismissal or a potentially fair reason under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The redundancy payment claim failed because the tribunal found no evidence that the requirements of the business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind had ceased or diminished. The tribunal also rejected the respondents' account that the claimant had given verbal resignation at the end of December 2017, noting that their later correspondence did not refer to the alleged 2 February meeting.
The remaining claims succeeded. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to six weeks' notice pay, that wages for February 2018 had not been paid, that no itemised pay statement was provided for February 2018, and that holiday pay was due on termination. It recorded agreed figures of £270 gross for four days' pay and £202.50 for three days' holiday pay, but left remedy issues to a separate hearing listed for 4 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal preferred the claimant's account and found that he was dismissed by telephone on 14 February 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found no evidence that the requirements of the business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind had ceased or diminished. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay succeeded and the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to six weeks' notice pay; quantum was left to the remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that February 2018 wages had not been paid. It recorded agreed figures of £270 gross for four days' pay and £202.50 for three days' holiday pay, but left final remedy to the later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The complaint of failure to provide an itemised pay statement for February 2018 succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held that unpaid holiday pay was due on termination, with quantum left to the remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- s.5 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.8 ERA 1996
- s.11 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.