Case 3304475/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Hill v Helios parcel LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304475/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, so the respondent filed no response to the claim. Employment Judge Ord therefore determined the matter on the claimant’s pleaded case and found that Miss C Hill had suffered unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal also found that accrued holiday pay had not been paid.
The judgment records the amounts found due as £2,200 for unlawful deductions from wages and £31.07 for unpaid holiday pay. No separate findings on liability, remedy structure, or interest are recorded beyond those sums, and no additional claims are identified in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response received from the respondent. The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £2,200. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; no response received from the respondent. The tribunal found accrued holiday pay had not been paid in the sum of £31.07. | Upheld | — | £31 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.