Case 3304480/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Sayani, Partner of the Respondent firm Interpreter: Mrs Joanna Jones, Polish speaker — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304480/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant worked for the Respondent as a Care Assistant from 23 October 2016 to 15 October 2017. Her claim form alleged race discrimination, and also claimed notice pay, holiday pay, and arrears of pay. At the hearing on 29 October 2019, the Respondent, after arriving late, accepted that there had been unlawful deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent accepted that unlawful deductions had been made. The parties agreed the sum due comprised £745.60 overtime, £198.18 untaken holiday, £142.96 statutory sick pay, and £407.19 for final wages, business mileage, and business expenses. The Tribunal ordered payment of £1,493.93, subject to tax and employee NIC deductions as appropriate, with no further deductions to be made. | Upheld | — | £1,494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,494
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.