Case 3304490/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Amis v Shred Station Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304490/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Amis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Amis brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Shred Station Ltd under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard at Norwich by remote public hearing via CVP on 28 May 2021 before Judge Brian Doyle, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaint was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so the judgment record itself contains no fuller explanation of the factual or legal basis for dismissal.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal contrary to section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.