Case 3304495/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Gibbins v Levitus Marketing Agency Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3304495/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Gibbins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr N Gibbins against Levitus Marketing Agency Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £625.45. The text also states that this figure was said to comprise £45 + £252 + £373.45 = £670.45, so the monetary wording in the extract is internally inconsistent. No other claim, liability issue, or separate remedy component is set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £625.45. The text also records the figures £45 + £252 + £373.45 = £670.45, so the monetary wording is internally inconsistent. | Upheld | — | £625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.