Case 3304508/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Stewart v Homestead Garden Rooms Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304508/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Stewart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on a notice-pay dispute heard remotely at Norwich on 18 January 2021 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant, Mrs K Stewart, appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that, as a matter of law under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant was entitled to no further notice pay. The judgment records that her employment started on 1 June 2017 and ended on 12 March 2020, and that she had already been paid two weeks' notice.
On that basis, the claimant's claim for a further eight weeks' notice, together with the two weeks already paid, was dismissed. The written record does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for further notice pay. The tribunal held that, as a matter of law under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant was entitled to no further notice pay because her employment began on 1 June 2017, ended on 12 March 2020, and she had already been paid two weeks' notice; the claim for a further eight weeks' notice and the two weeks already paid was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.