Case 3304523/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Tyas v Main Stream Direct Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304523/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Tyas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 June 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr G Tyas an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders dated 14 February 2025 and 28 April 2025. The judgment records that he did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying heads of claim beyond the strike-out decision, and it records no monetary award. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Tynan on 11 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 10 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 14 February 2025 and 28 April 2025 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 14 February 2025 and 28 April 2025 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 14 February 2025 and 28 April 2025 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 14 February 2025 and 28 April 2025 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.