Case 3304539/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adrian Stefan Stoica v The Polish Bakery Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304539/2022
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adrian Stefan Stoica
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Hearing Centre on 29 November 2022, Employment Judge Tobin sat alone and heard the claimant and the respondent’s representative. The tribunal held that Mr Adrian Stefan Stoica succeeded in his holiday pay claim under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Compensation was agreed between the parties at £75.67.
The claimant withdrew his race discrimination and age discrimination claims. No findings on the merits of those discrimination claims were recorded, and the judgment states that proceedings were then concluded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded in his holiday pay claim under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Compensation was agreed at £75.67. | Upheld | — | £76 |
| Race discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £76
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.