Case 3304546/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Walgreens Boots Alliance — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304546/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote CVP hearing on 17 March 2021, Employment Judge Alliott sat alone and heard the claimant in person and the respondent by solicitor. The claimant said she had made claims for a redundancy payment and for failure to consult.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant said she remained employed by the respondent, was no longer furloughed, and was being paid. On that basis, the judge held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment therefore struck out the claimant's claim in its entirety. No monetary award was made and no liability findings were determined beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant said she remained employed by the respondent, was no longer furloughed, and was being paid. The tribunal held the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | This covers the pleaded failure to consult. The tribunal struck out the claim for the same reason: the claimant remained employed, was no longer furloughed, and was being paid, so there was no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.