Case 3304554/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Connifer Rodrigues v LHR Airports Limited STRIKE OUT — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304554/2022
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Connifer Rodrigues
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's sole remaining claim under this case number was unfair dismissal. The tribunal had previously made a deposit order for £150 on 21 June 2023, on the basis that the claim had little reasonable prospects of success. The claimant was sent the deposit order and the reasons for it, and was required to pay by 12 July 2023.
The claimant did not pay the ordered deposit by the deadline. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that all of the claims advanced under this claim number were then either struck out or dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claimant's sole remaining unfair dismissal claim after a deposit order of £150 was sent on 21 June 2023 because the claim was considered to have little reasonable prospects of success. The claimant did not pay the deposit by the deadline of 12 July 2023, so the claim was struck out under Rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 39(4) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.