Case 3304556/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Malachi Somers v Roadbridge UK Limited (in administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304556/2022
- Decision date
- 1 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Malachi Somers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Malachi Somers, attended the remote hearing in person and the respondent did not attend or participate. Employment Judge G Tobin heard the matter alone at Watford Hearing Centre on 1 June 2023.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant succeeded in his claims for a protective award under s188 and s188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. No further factual findings or disputed issues are set out in the written record provided.
The tribunal awarded the claimant a protective award of £12,857.14. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant succeeded in his claims for a protective award under s188 and s188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The award was £12,857.14. | Upheld | — | £12,857 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,857
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s188 & s188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.