Case 3304564/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend, nor represented For the v Mr HN Gregorian, Owner DISMISSAL — 2022
- Case reference
- 3304564/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend, nor represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 2 and 3 August 2022 before Employment Judge Bedeau. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Mr H Gregorian, attended in person.
The judgment records that the tribunal had sent the claimant email and messages informing her of the hearing and that she was required to attend, and warning that failure to do so might lead to dismissal of her claims. The claimant did not respond and did not attend the hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims against the respondent under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not contain findings on the substantive merits of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance; the judgment does not separately set out the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed under rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance; the judgment does not separately set out the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance; the judgment does not separately set out the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance; the judgment does not separately set out the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.