Case 3304569/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S HAINES v Ikon Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304569/2024
- Decision date
- 22 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S HAINES
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. On that basis, the tribunal dealt with the claim on the material available in the judgment.
The tribunal found that Mrs S Haines had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded her damages of £1,188.32 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that finding, she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,546.40. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £3,734.72.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,188.32. | Upheld | — | £1,188 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,546.40. | Upheld | — | £2,546 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,735
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.