Case 3304575/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Meachem, Solicitor-Advocate For the v Ms G Burns, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304575/2020
- Decision date
- 27 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Meachem, Solicitor-Advocate For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 16 August 2021 before Employment Judge Bedeau. The tribunal was asked to decide whether Ms Elisabeth Idowu had a disability for Equality Act purposes at the material time. The respondent accepted that she appeared to have a mental impairment, but disputed that it had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on her ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.
The tribunal found that the claimant had a mental impairment in the form of stress and anxiety, but not depression. It accepted her evidence and the medical records that she had a consistent history of stress-related problems, with particular deterioration after the deaths of her aunt in July 2019 and her grandfather on 26 October 2019. The tribunal noted records from 25 November 2019 and 2 March 2020, including references to panic attacks, chest pains, work-related stress, generalised anxiety disorder and low mood, and it accepted that the claimant had been receiving counselling and had difficulty sleeping.
Applying section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal held that the effects were more than minor or trivial. It found that when affected by stress and anxiety the claimant had difficulty getting out of bed, became lethargic, spoke and moved more slowly, experienced panic attacks, and was unable to do activities such as cycling, dancing and socialising. It was satisfied that she became disabled from 25 November 2019, while employed by the respondents. The tribunal listed the case for a final hearing in September to October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled from 25 November 2019 under section 6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010. It did not determine the merits of the underlying disability discrimination claim at this hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- section 212(1) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010
- section 6(5) Equality Act 2010
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd [2002] IRLR 24
- Banaszczyk v Booker Ltd [2016] IRLR 273
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.